On March 9, 2009, Barack Obama approved use of Federal taxpayer dollars to fund embryonic stem cell research. The harvesting of embryonic stem cells destroys the embryo, killing an unborn baby. Therefore, when you pay your taxes, some of your money is being used to kill unborn babies.
Supporters are arguing the unborn babies are just embryos who were going to be discarded and would have died anyway, but that reasoning is flawed. Just because a person is going to die, it does not make it fair to kill that person. If you found a paralyzed child, who was lying in the snow after being abandoned, would it be okay to kill the child, even if you had a greater purpose in mind? The child has been discarded. He is going to die anyway. If his death might bring about some sort of benefit, is it okay to kill him?
Well, Obama has now answered this question for you. He has condoned the extermination of unborn babies for a greater good, and he is sending your money to fund the process. Every time you pay your taxes, you are financing the termination of unborn children. Is this what you want the Federal government to do with your money--money you could be using to buy clothes and food for family?